Ad Placement Cost Prediction using Stepwise Regression in ML
FREE Online Courses: Knowledge Awaits – Click for Free Access!
Digital advertisers allocate budgets across a variety of placements—banner ads, native content slots, pre‑roll videos—yet the cost efficiency of each placement can vary widely based on factors such as site position, time of day, and targeting parameters.
In this ad placement cost prediction ML project, we’ll predict the daily placement cost (media_cost_usd) for social and display ads based on features including impressions, clicks, conversions, ad position in content, and campaign duration.
Libraries Required
import pandas as pd # Data loading & manipulation import numpy as np # Numerical operations import statsmodels.api as sm # Ordinary Least Squares regression from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split # Train/test split from sklearn.metrics import r2_score, mean_squared_error # Evaluation metrics import matplotlib.pyplot as plt # Visualization
Dataset
Step-by-Step Code Implementation
Data Loading & Initial Inspection
We load daily ad campaign spend data—including impressions, clicks, conversions, campaign duration, and ad position—and inspect its schema and descriptive statistics.
# Block 1: Load dataset url = "https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/rahulchavan99/marketing-campaign-dataset/download" df = pd.read_csv(url) # Inspect structure print(df.head()) print(df.info()) print(df.describe()) Dataset contains daily rows with media_cost_usd, impressions, clicks, conversions, duration_in_days, and position_in_content
Data Preprocessing
- Incomplete records are dropped. We log‑transform impressions to reduce skew and compute CTR (clicks/impressions) as an efficiency metric.
- Predictors (X) include transformed and raw features; the target (y) is media_cost_usd. We split the data 80/20 for training and testing.
# Block 2: Clean & feature engineering
# Drop incomplete records
df = df.dropna(subset=['media_cost_usd','impressions','clicks','conversions','duration_in_days','position_in_content'])
# Optionally scale or transform variables to reduce skew (e.g., log(impressions+1))
df['log_impressions'] = np.log1p(df['impressions'])
df['ctr'] = df['clicks'] / df['impressions'] # click‑through rate
# Define predictors and target
X = df[['log_impressions','ctr','conversions','duration_in_days','position_in_content']]
y = df['media_cost_usd']
# Split into training and test sets (80/20)
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42
)
Stepwise Regression Function
- The stepwise_selection function iteratively adds the excluded variable with the lowest p -value below 0.01 (forward inclusion).
- It removes the included variable with the highest p -value above 0.05 (backward elimination), stopping when no further changes occur.
- Therefore yields a concise set of statistically significant predictors.
# Block 3: Forward–backward stepwise selection
def stepwise_selection(X, y,
initial_list=[],
threshold_in=0.01,
threshold_out=0.05,
verbose=True):
included = list(initial_list)
while True:
changed = False
# Forward step: try each excluded feature
excluded = list(set(X.columns) - set(included))
new_pvals = pd.Series(index=excluded, dtype=float)
for col in excluded:
model = sm.OLS(y, sm.add_constant(X[included + [col]])).fit()
new_pvals[col] = model.pvalues[col]
best_pval = new_pvals.min()
if best_pval < threshold_in:
best_var = new_pvals.idxmin()
included.append(best_var)
changed = True
if verbose:
print(f"Add {best_var:25} p-value {best_pval:.4f}")
# Backward step: test removing each included feature
model = sm.OLS(y, sm.add_constant(X[included])).fit()
pvals = model.pvalues.iloc[1:] # exclude intercept
worst_pval = pvals.max()
if worst_pval > threshold_out:
worst_var = pvals.idxmax()
included.remove(worst_var)
changed = True
if verbose:
print(f"Drop {worst_var:25} p-value {worst_pval:.4f}")
if not changed:
break
return included
Model Building & Evaluation
- Using the selected features, we fit an Ordinary Least Squares regression via statsmodels.
- The .summary() output reports coefficient estimates (cost impact per unit change), p -values (statistical significance), R², adjusted R², and diagnostic metrics (F‑statistic, AIC), offering transparent insight into spend drivers.
- Predictions on the held‑out test set yield R² (variance explained) and RMSE (root‑mean‑square error), quantifying model generalization.
# Block 4: Feature selection
selected_features = stepwise_selection(X_train, y_train)
# Fit final OLS model
X_train_sel = sm.add_constant(X_train[selected_features])
model = sm.OLS(y_train, X_train_sel).fit()
print(model.summary())
# Predict on test set
X_test_sel = sm.add_constant(X_test[selected_features])
y_pred = model.predict(X_test_sel)
# Compute performance metrics
print("Test R²:", r2_score(y_test, y_pred))
print("Test RMSE:", np.sqrt(mean_squared_error(y_test, y_pred)))
Residual Diagnostics
We plot residuals versus predicted costs to check for heteroscedasticity or systematic patterns, therefore validating key OLS assumptions and ensuring the model’s reliability.
# Block 5: Residual plot
residuals = y_test - y_pred
plt.scatter(y_pred, residuals, alpha=0.5)
plt.axhline(0, linestyle="--")
plt.xlabel("Predicted Media Cost (USD)")
plt.ylabel("Residuals")
plt.title("Residuals vs. Predicted Cost")
plt.show()
Summary
By applying stepwise regression to ad placement data, we isolate the most influential cost drivers—such as log‑impressions, CTR, conversions, campaign length, and ad position—while pruning non‑informative variables.
Hence, the resulting linear model balances interpretability (few, significant predictors) with predictive accuracy (high test‑set R², low RMSE), providing media planners a transparent, data‑driven tool to forecast placement costs and optimize budget allocation across channels.